Wed

Jan 14
2009

Nat Torkington

Four short links: 14 Jan 2009

by Nat Torkington | @gnatcomments: 2

Something beautiful, something informative, something mindblowing, something revealing: something for everyone in today's link set.

  1. Trees and Forests on Old Russian Maps - old maps, like old books, are works of art. I loved this collection of symbols; it reminded me how much creativity and beauty we've lost (temporarily, I hope) in modern maps.
  2. Distinguishing Decorative from Meaningful Elements in UI Design - as a thoughtless cloth-eyed coder who designs CSS with the same care and attention that a boar on Viagra devotes to lovemaking, I appreciate this detailed explanation of why a simple design choice (a border around something) turns out to have been the wrong thing to do.
  3. Interview with Clay Shirky and Part 2 - from Columbia Journalism Review. This is as good as the Bruce Sterling improv on the future from last week. Every paragraph has a philosophically sound quotable nugget. This is about the future of newspapers, the fiction of "information overload", the bogosity of Luddism, and a fine fine rebuttal to Nick Carr's Google stupidity.
  4. Sampling Twitter - serious geekery by Dewitt Clinton, who tried to sample the Twitter ID space for an indication of representative user behaviour--follows, friends, active, etc. "Again extrapolating for accounts too new to test and private accounts, this suggests that 23% of all assigned ids, and thus 6.8% of all potential user ids, are assigned to someone who is posting regularly, is following other users, and is being followed by at least one other user. This implies that there there are up to 1,200,000-1,300,000 active, connected users on Twitter."

tags: design, google, journalism, map, twittercomments: 2
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/8351

Comments: 2

Thomas Lord [2009-01-14 02:42 PM]

I want to toss something into the echo chamber about newspapers.

Suppose a paper, like the NYT, for purely fetish reasons adopts the format as sacred: pages are a certain size, divided into columns a certain way, there's news-hole and ad-space.

You could represent an edition as XML - pure digitial, logical mark-up with sensitivity to the implied format.

Papers should be in the business of selling licenses to such XML that include the rights to fill in some of the ad-space and the rights to print for distribution and the rights to "quote fully" on blogs.

-t

Bill [2009-01-29 12:33 AM]

Reilly nice links. The Old Russian Maps are beautiful. Thanks for this good links

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)