Mon

Mar 9
2009

Darren Barefoot

Startup Marketing Isn't Rocket Science, So Don't Hire the Ph.D Too Soon

by Darren Barefoot | @dbarefootcomments: 7

Guest blogger Darren Barefoot is a writer, marketer, technologist, and co-founder of Capulet Communications, a web marketing firm that specializes in high-tech and sustainability clients. He is the co-author of a forthcoming book about social media marketing for No Starch Press entitled "Friends with Benefits." Darren's personal blog is DarrenBarefoot.com.

.

A couple of weeks ago, my partner and I met with a potential client, the newly-hired Vice President of Marketing at a technology startup. She was a heavyweight, having spent the last decade in charge of marketing at a major Canadian corporation. She'd been craving a change of pace, and so accepted an offer to oversee the marketing at this eight-person startup. She'd only been with the company for a couple of weeks, so I asked about her immediate plans. She replied, "I'm going to start by putting some policies and procedures in place--we could really use more structure."

Her response highlighted one of the most common mistakes we encounter when working with early-stage startups: the founders hire too much marketing talent too early.

Why does this happen? I'm not sure, but I wonder if it's because many founders have a technical background. As such, they're unfamiliar and sometimes a little intimidated by the challenges of promoting their startup. To assuage their concerns, they bring in a senior marketer with plenty of credentials.

In theory, this looks like a rational decision. After all, the more experienced the executive, the better. Practically speaking, things aren't quite that simple.

These types are usually great strategists. That's what got them high on the ladder at their previous corporate or agency job. They're accustomed to devising a strategic plan and overseeing a team that implements that plan. That's fine, because, a startup obviously needs strategy.

By their nature, though, they're thinkers, not doers. They're great at wrestling with thorny messaging problems or rejigging the corporate branding, but how often have they run a CPC advertising campaign, or how good are they at grokking Google Analytics?

The work they're accustomed to delegating or outsourcing is now work that they must do themselves. They have some 'doing' skills, but they're often atrophied or antiquated. Your average startup doesn't have a graphic designer or a copywriter or an SEO expert on staff. The VP of marketing at a bootstrapped startup must be all of these people, and we find that the average corporate escapee can't fill those roles.

What's the answer? A startup still needs strategic thinking. It just doesn't need it 40 hours a week with medical benefits and a corner office. Instead, founders should contract a senior marketing consultant with expertise in their field for a fixed number of hours a month. Have them weigh in on the hard decisions, draft launch plans and so forth.

Then, saving on the cost of an executive's salary, contract out the tactical marketing or employ a couple junior staffers to do the legwork. Marketing isn't rocket science, after all, so hold off on hiring that marketing Ph.D. until you're certain that you need them.


tags: emerging tech, web 2.0comments: 7
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/8549

Comments: 7

valery [2009-03-09 10:02 AM]

Well, this sounds like a well-placed sales pitch for your own service :-) Pretty useless otherwise.

Darren [2009-03-09 10:04 AM]

@valery I appreciate that I may be biased, but I'm only reporting what I've seen over the past decade. What's your experience been of marketing executives at startups?

Alan Rocker [2009-03-09 11:32 AM]


Get hold of a copy of "Up The Organisation" http://tinyurl.com/bfvq5q and read the section on why startups should NOT hire big-corporation types.

It's as true now as it was when it was written in 1970.

rick [2009-03-09 12:51 PM]

There are a lot of good mid-level marketing types who can provide good strategy insight and are not only able but willing to get down and do the work. I'm not at all certain that a true startup needs high level strategic marketing AT ALL. Startup problems are almost never related to branding or PR strategy but to more straightforward issues - pricing, positioning and making sure that the product is actually good.

Give me a great product that clearly answers a market need and that's not like 10 other products which all answer the same need and I'll market it just fine without someone obsessing over what our brand means. By time branding etc really become important to a company they're not really a startup anymore though they might be a small company.

Tamara Gruber [2009-03-13 07:57 AM]

Completely agree, of course I am biased too. I've spent my career working for high tech start ups or small companies and have seen them pull in a heavy weight right before a funding round but that person is not ready to get the work done. For the past six years I've been providing those Interim VP of Marketing services to help out start ups that need someone that thinks strategically but knows how to get all the work done. Most find having a resource like this on a part-time basis, is all they need until they achieve significant growth or exit.

Dave McClure [2009-03-13 08:49 AM]

actually, most times it's not just an issue of strategic (thinker) vs tactical (doer) skills, but rather the type of marketing experience.

many more senior marketing execs don't have online marketing skills & experience, especially in newer areas that have only come up in the past 5 years or so. it's rare that i see someone with more than 15 years of marketing experience who understands:
- SEO & SEM (which are different)
- blogging & social media
- widgets & apps
- social networks
- rich media (video, images)
- link-sharing tools & services

in fact, it's not very common that a lot of older media types even understand *EMAIL* marketing very well, and probably haven't done many campaigns there either.

beyond just the experience in doing any of these campaigns, many more people have no concept of using analytical tools & testing/optimization techniques to fine-tune their campaigns & get the most out of their "strategy".

in short: people with 3-5 years experience in more recent online customer acquisition techniques, and who are smart & hard-working are likely a much better fit for a startup than a senior exec with 10-20 years experience who isn't familir with current tools.

you may get lucky and find both in one body, but usually for startups i'd bet on the person with more recent expertise, even if they're less experienced overall. not always, but most times.

Sean Ellis [2009-03-17 08:59 AM]

Most startups fall flat on the marketing side because they can't figure out who really needs their product, why the need it, what constitutes a great experience for these people and how to onramp more of them into this experience. Steve Blank's book "The Four Steps to the Epiphany" gives an excellent framework for figuring this out. Combine this framework with metrics driven iteration and you'll significantly increase your chances of startup marketing success. The whole process is fairly intuitive but I agree with Darren that most "traditional marketers" way over think it. Once you get early customer development right, then a tactical online marketing "doer" will have a reasonable chance of being successful.

Corporate marketing executives that step into a startup marketing role are making a stupid career move. It's like a renowned lawyer that decides to become a brain surgeon. It's a whole different career path.

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






RECOMMENDED FOR YOU