|
|
|||||
Strata Week: A .data TLD?A proposal for a .data TLD, flavors of Hadoop, and a vote for pseudonymous commenters.Here are some of the data stories that caught my attention this week. Should there be a .data TLD?
Wolfram continues:
So how would a .data TLD change the way humans and computers interact with data? Or would it change anything? If you've got ideas of how .data could be put to use, please share them in the comments. Strata 2012 — The 2012 Strata Conference, being held Feb. 28-March 1 in Santa Clara, Calif., will offer three full days of hands-on data training and information-rich sessions. Strata brings together the people, tools, and technologies you need to make data work.Save 20% on registration with the code RADAR20 Cloudera addresses what Apache Hadoop 1.0 means to its customersLast week, the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) announced that Hadoop had reached version 1.0. This week, Cloudera took to its blog to explain what that milestone means to its customers. The post, in part, explains how Hadoop has branched from its trunk, noting that all of this has caused some confusion for Cloudera customers:
Cloudera explains to its customers that it's offered the equivalent for "approximately a year now" and compares the Apache Hadoop efforts to its own offerings. The post is an interesting insight into not just how the ASF operates, but how companies that offer services around those projects have to iterate and adapt. Disqus says that pseudonymous commenters are bestDebates over blog comments have resurfaced recently, with a back and forth about whether or not they're good, bad, evil, or irrelevant. Adding some fuel to the fire (or data to the discussion, at least) comes Disqus with its own research based on its commenting service. According to the Disqus research, commenters using pseudonyms actually are "the most valuable contributors to communities," as their comments are both the highest quantity and quality. Those findings run counter to the idea that those who comment online without using their real names actually lessen rather than enhance quality conversations. Disqus' data indicates that pseudonymity might engender a more engaged and more engaging community. That notion stands in contrast to arguments that anonymity leads to more trollish and unruly behavior. Got data news?Feel free to email me. Related: |
|||||
|
|||||
Comments: 2
Paul Miller [12 January 2012 12:08 PM]
On Wolfram's .data proposal, the sentiment seems right, but I struggle to see anything whatsoever that's positive about using a TLD to get there.
I blogged some thoughts on this yesterday, at http://cloudofdata.com/2012/01/top-level-domain-for-data-answers-the-wrong-question/
I look forward to seeing whether other people in the space take a more positive position...
Ann Feeney [16 January 2012 02:02 PM]
The value of pseudonymous comments rings true with my own observations of online communities. A pseudonym combines the virtue of anonymity (candor) with that of being a named user (having a concern for one's reputation) and also necessitates enough level of commitment to the discussion forum or community to have registered that pseudonym.