Mon

Sep 26
2005

Nat Torkington

Nat Torkington

Attenuation: Google Information Market and onLife

I've had the ETech riff on attenuation going through my head lately. Google's Information Market is an example of attenuation: taking hundreds of different opinions and boiling them down to a forecast that's probably right. Even the New York Times was impressed (thanks, Marc, for the pointers). Surj pointed me at Onlife, a Mac app that's along the lines of Nat Friedman's Dashboard (not to be confused with Apple's Dashboard). Onlife uses the built-in monitoring facilities of Apple apps to build a single clear view of your interaction with those apps--the mail you read, the IMs you sent, the web pages you visited, the songs you listened to, etc. It also indexes all the web pages you visit, a kind of outboard brain for your browser. It's yet to be shown that this helps me attenuate my inputs: the key is whether I'll use this instead of some other set of features in the apps, or whether it just becomes another input I have to manage (in which case I'll turn it off).


tags:   | comments: 5   | Sphere It
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/4308

Comments: 5

  Sid Steward [09.28.05 12:47 PM]

Whoops. When I first scanned this post I thought Google had disclosed a way to boil all the personal data it collects, e.g. search history and emails, into market intelligence. But then I guess they wouldn't publicize that, would they. Sorry, it's the conspiracy theorist in me. (-:

  Sid Steward [09.28.05 01:07 PM]

(my first comment evaporated, let me try this again.) When I first scanned nat's post on Attenuation I thought Google had disclosed a way to boil all the personal data it collects, e.g. search history and emails, into market intelligence. But then I guess they wouldn't publicize that, would they. -- Sorry, it's the conspiracy theorist in me. -- But if they don't, they should. Wouldn't you?

  Sid Steward [09.28.05 01:09 PM]

(Sorry about the dup. Firefox was hiding my first comment, just had to refresh.)

  Richard Veryard [10.05.05 05:19 AM]

One of the reasons we need attenuation is because there is a lot of repetition on the web. I said, one of the reasons we need attenuation is because there is a lot of repetition on the web.

(Dear moderator, please don't delete Sid's accidental repetition above, or else my comment loses its "presence".)

  Trefa [10.27.05 12:14 PM]

Do you think that comments are useful? Commentators give us illusion of conversation... Nevermind...
Good job done.
online

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






Type the characters you see in the picture above.