Sun

Mar 5
2006

Tim O'Reilly

Tim O'Reilly

Google Dreams Big

Greg Linden's blog entry on the Google Analyst day [via IP] is nice both because it includes a link to the presentation, and because Greg makes some thoughtful comments based on the notes that were in the ppt that was originally published before Google replaced it with a PDF:


Google is hosting an analyst day today. I found skimming the 94 slide presentation (PPT, PDF alternative) to be interesting and worthwhile.

In particular, I liked slide 19, 20, and 31, all of which makes it clear that Google isn't losing its wide-eyed optimism.

Slide 31 says that Google's philosophy to new product development is "no constraints" and that they initially ignore "CPU power, storage, bandwidth, and monetization."

Slide 20 says (in the notes) that Google plans to "get all the worlds information, not just some."

And slide 19 (in the notes) talks about how their work is inspired by the idea of "a world with infinite storage, bandwidth, and CPU power." They say that "the experience should really be instantaneous". They say that they should be able to "house all user files, including: emails, web history, pictures, bookmarks, etc and make it accessible from anywhere (any device, any platform, etc)" which leads to a world where "the online copy of your data will become your Golden Copy and your local-machine copy serves more like a cache". And, they say that they want "transparent personalization" that uses user "data to transparently optimize the user's experience ... implicitly."
From my personal interactions with Google's execs, with I completely agree that Google is sincere in this vision, and really is thinking big. But whether it's Google who builds this platform or someone else, or whether it's a tapestry woven collectively by many companies and projects, the vision that they lay out is one that we seem to be moving inexorably towards, barring the collapse of civilization as we know it. (Insert your disaster here.)



Also responding to the Analyst day presentation, I received an insightful message from Kris Tuttle of Research 2.0 in email, focusing more narrowly on the financial implications of the presentation. Kris noted:

For investors there are only two areas to pay attention to:

1. How well the advertising infrastructure platform of AdWords/AdSense expands into multi-mode, multi-channel capability. The existing platform has done a fantastic job in the online CPC model. Google in the process of generalizing the infrastructure to work across multiple online and offline networks and more types of content and monetization models. This ties in with other product efforts like Local and Mobile but essentially everything else Google does from a product standpoint is not very important to investors. Debates over the quality of Earth versus Mail verus Talk versus Base versus Maps are not worth the effort. This is where all the money is.

2. Growth in International is a key proof point for the underlying assumptions behind the business model and the ability for management to execute the strategy. Each geography may be very different in specifics but in general the success Google has or doesn't have internationally will indicate whether their expansion is going to continue or not.

All the rest is just so much noise and there is plenty of it given the intense interest and scrutiny for this company.


tags:   | comments: 5   | Sphere It
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/4507

Comments: 5

  Tim O'Reilly [03.05.06 02:21 PM]

In a followup on Dave Farber's IP list, John Kristoff noted the irony of a company that promises access to all the world's information substituting a PDF containing less information for the original file. Was that just an attempt to provide a more portable file format, or an attempt to reduce the amount of information available?

  Kevin Farnham [03.06.06 09:04 AM]

For many people, the first, instinctive reaction to a statement that Google wants to "get all the worlds information, not just some" is to recoil. But, clearly this is where the world is headed.

Just as clearly, Google will not have a monopoly on "all the world's information". The information Google archives is public information. A multitude of providers will eventually have the same information.

The competition among these future information archivers and providers will not be about "who has more information archived?" but rather "who can help me locate the information I need most efficiently?"

The scarier aspect, I think, is when you put together sites like MySpace.com (about which I'm writing a book right now) and information archivers like Google. Details of careless online expression (by teens, for example) are being archived, and will be available in the future.

The archive becomes an infrastructural "memory" that has never existed before in society. Combine this with technologies for identifying individuals across different data sets, and you do end up with something to fear.

  Roman Bischoff [03.07.06 12:38 AM]

So Google might do what Microsoft intended to do back in 2001 with "Hailstorm", and in fact is a IBM approach: one central internet-mainframe with many different kinds of remote terminals. Do I really want it? Maybe. Depends on the operator and on how easy it will be to move all data to another operator.

  Tim O'Reilly [03.07.06 08:19 AM]

Roman -- You hit the nail on the head. In my talks, I often ask, what kind of next generation platform do we want to build? "One ring to rule them all" (a la Lord of the Rings), or "small pieces loosely joined," the current architecture of the net. Google, however well-intentioned, does take us in the former direction, unless they make affirmative steps towards data portability.

  Lord [04.10.06 01:44 AM]

Surfing I just found this: The G-drive isn't new, or even original... at Stata Labs in 2003 I was in a meeting where Raymie Stata showed a very, very similar concept, then named "B-drive" (after Bloomba) to a big group of Google engineers and corporate development folks at Google. Stata Labs was acquired by Yahoo within a year, and Raymie is now a senior level search architect. Makes me wonder when we'll hear about the "Y-drive" project.

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






Type the characters you see in the picture above.