Mon

Apr 17
2006

Nikolaj Nyholm

Nikolaj Nyholm

Context vs location

Nokia user experience champion and Etech speaker alumni Chris Heathcote has a round-up of S60-based Flickr uploaders. The real gem of the piece is, however, hidden at end, discussing the bluetagging feature of two of the uploaders:

The most controversial feature of them all is storing and publishing Bluetooth IDs. Are these personal information? Are you allowed to store this data (particularly in the EU)? It’s, well, illuminating from a privacy angle, but my take on it is that metadata is always useful. Already in Helsinki, with probably a few tens of users of both Meaning and Context Watcher, we’re seeing intersections between Bluetooth device IDs on photos: this means that a particular device/individual was nearby both ekurvine and myself when we took the pictures.

I've been trying to make a point for a while that it's typically more important who's around you than where you are. Context versus location. In broad terms, location gives you the yellow pages spread thin on a map while context gives you the richness associated with true life -- work, private, and play.


tags:   | comments: 1   | Sphere It
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/4582

Comments: 1

  Bernie Goldbach [04.18.06 01:40 AM]

While you cannot blame people for wanting to glue themselves together with cool webby applications, few people actually consider how the State should be respecting the way the information is harvested and used. It often amazes me to see street-level perspectives of places nearby the images I've shot and Zonetagged. You could easily set up a surveillance network on the back of snap-happy cameraphone users. People need to know what metadata they're feeding because most of my friends think they're upstreaming pixels, not contextual data.

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






Type the characters you see in the picture above.