Previous  |  Next

Mon

Nov 13
2006

Adam Messinger

Adam Messinger

Bill Miller on Silicon Valley

I had the good fortune of seeing Prof. Bill Miller speak recently as part of a lecture series hosted by the Sloan Fellows. He is something of a legend of Silicon Valley, having been involved in the start-up the Mayfield fund, the CEO of SRI, on the boards of several start-ups, the Provost of Stanford, and a Professor in both the Engineering and Graduate Business Schools. Already into his eighties, he recently founded yet another company called NanoStellar, but also spends a good deal of time studying what makes Silicon Valley work.

The talk I attended was mostly on this final topic and specifically what it is about Silicon Valley which allows it to continue to re-invent itself to change with the times. Miller has documented a list of a dozen factors in his book "The Silicon Valley Edge" which he claims are the ingredients that make Silicon Valley successful. I thought his perspective was interesting partly because it related to some previous Radar and Paul Graham posts I'd read, but also because it came from a man who had seen the Valley move from vacuum tubes to silicon, then from silicon to software, and finally from software to the internet. Much of what he said overlapped with these earlier articles, but there are a few points in particular which I think are worth calling out here:

1. Universities and research institutes which interact with industry

A key point from Miller's perspective is that having great universities around isn't enough, they need to be a functioning part of the community. Clearly this means having alumni who go out to form companies, but it needs to also include a way for the university insiders to participate in innovation. Taking the case of Stanford, Miller points out that there are revenue sharing incentives in place which encourage schools and departments to allow their professors to take part in professional activities.

2. Meritocratic and risk-taking culture

Miller points out that as compared to much of the world, Silicon Valley relatively devoid of old boys clubs which act as gatekeepers. If your idea is good enough, you can generally get financing, deals, employees, etc., here. Additionally, Silicon Valley is relatively tolerant of failure, with some entrepreneurs succeeding only after many failed attempts. This is something that is in stark contrast with much of the world.

3. Global linkages

For any number of reasons, be it world-class universities or the high quality of life, people from all over the world move to Silicon Valley. This creates a flux of people with a variety knowledge bases and personal connections. Miller claims that it is in this mixing of knowledge that new ideas are formed and that in the unique network of relationships that they are able to be realized.



tags:   | comments: 6   | Sphere It
submit:

 

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://orm3.managed.sonic.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6253

Henrik   [11.13.06 03:59 AM]

Which then begs the question, what created the culture?

Jokull   [11.13.06 05:06 AM]

There seems to be a lot of uncharted territory in the study of the formation of economic and cultural environments. Here in Iceland there is a huge financial community that would be very interesting to study. Risk tolerance and heritage seem to be very important factors.

Can we learn enough from these centers of economic and cultural activity to MAKE them happen (with regulation, incentives etc.) or are they totally unpredictable and free-flowing?

Michael Graebner   [11.14.06 02:55 PM]

would like to add one more factor - a wide variety of long lasting SIGs which meet regularly to discuss every imaginable topic. Check IEEE for multiple examples. The informational mix found at such meetings exists nowhere else.

Michael Scriven   [11.14.06 06:01 PM]

This all seems to me to add up to one key theme: the climate/context creates an evaluative environment that has remained nearly ideal, that is, it manages to balance, instead of being hijacked by, the old boys' network, or the bankers/marketers, or the techies, or the academics, the four main threats to tough evaluation. Whenever they can get enough control, as for example the bankers/marketers did at Microsoft, they cut back on real evaluation or corrupt it into a marketing device (e.g., Microsoft's '500,000 beta-testers').

Jokull   [11.16.06 03:26 AM]

I'm not sure this brittle environment idea applies to all cases. Hollywood is an example where the environment benefited greatly from an old boys' network.

I think your right in the respect that a hacker spirit can be crushed easily though.

David Evans   [11.21.06 09:06 PM]

It's a past time in Australia to "cut down tall poppies" and enjoy the failures of those who reach too high. Silicon Valley's culture of supporting innovation and the entrepreneurs who drive it makes this the place for me and my start-up.


Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)




Remember Me?


Subscribe to this Site

Radar RSS feed

RELEASE 2.0 BACK ISSUES

BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE

CURRENT CONFERENCES