<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>O&#039;Reilly Radar &#187; Kat Meyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radar.oreilly.com/kmeyer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radar.oreilly.com</link>
	<description>Insight, analysis, and research about emerging technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TOC Debate: Amazon vs Apple</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/08/amazon-vs-apple-ebook-toc-debate.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/08/amazon-vs-apple-ebook-toc-debate.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toc debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2011/08/amazon-vs-apple-ebook-toc-debate.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which ebook platform is mightier? Find out when Team Bezos (Joe Wikert) takes on Team Jobs (Kassia Krozser) in a free webcast on Thursday, Sept. 15, at 10 am PT. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One day in the not-so-distant past, <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/joew">Joe Wikert</a> and I had a semi-heated Skype argument about the publishing topic du jour. I knew I wouldn&#8217;t win, but as I continued to make my case Joe suddenly interrupted with the prescient statement: &#8220;This would make for a great webcast!&#8221; </p>
<p>Maybe it was just a clever way of disarming me, and if so &mdash; it worked. But no sooner did we end our Skype chat then I was on Twitter, inquiring of my bookish-techy tweeps, &#8220;Would you be interested in such a webcast?&#8221; The answer was &#8220;yes.&#8221; Joe jumped into the tweet fray and suggested the topic for what will be our first in the TOC Debates: Amazon vs. Apple.</p>
<p>Joe valiantly (ahem) volunteered to take up the cause of Amazon and act as Team Bezos. But, who, pray tell would be brave enough to stand up for Apple? The most eloquent arguer one could hope for &mdash; Ms. <a href="http://booksquare.com/">Booksquare</a> herself &mdash; <a href="http://booksquare.com/about/">Kassia Krozser</a> stepped up to the challenge to represent Team Jobs.</p>
<p>So, what began as a disagreement between colleagues has blossomed into what we think might become the most fun you can have fighting at work: the TOC Debates.</p>
<p><a href="http://oreillynet.com/pub/e/2035?cmp=il-radar-webcast-toc-debate-amazon-v-apple"><strong>Register to attend the free Amazon vs Apple webcast.</a></strong></p>
<p>As a bit of a preview, I offer a statement from each of the opponents (also available in audio form, above). As we say in Arizona,  &#8220;Them&#8217;s fighting words &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Joe Wikert (GM and Publisher, O&#8217;Reilly Media):</p>
<blockquote>
<p><img src="http://s.radar.oreilly.com/2011/08/23/0811-jwikert.jpg" border="0" alt="Joe Wikert" width="95" style="float: right;margin: 3px 0 10px 10px" />This will be like shooting fish in a barrel. When I said I&#8217;d like to see a debate about Amazon vs. Apple&#8217;s ebook platforms, and said I&#8217;d take the Amazon position, I never thought I&#8217;d find someone who would represent Apple! Shortly after that, Amazon announced their Kindle Cloud Reader initiative. Wow, yet another point for my case! I have loads of respect for Kassia Krozser, but she&#8217;s got her work cut out for her. I&#8217;m very much looking forward to the debate as well as addressing questions from the audience.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Kassia Krozser, (proprietress of Booksquare.com):</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://s.radar.oreilly.com/2011/08/23/0811-kkrozser.jpg" border="0" alt="Kassia Krozser" width="95" style="float: right;margin: 3px 0 10px 10px" /><br />
Joe may wish he chose the Apple side! I won&#8217;t deny that Amazon has many strengths, but they also have an amazing weakness: selective vision. The Kindle platform is based on an old, creaky format. Apple gets the web, and it gets the technology, hardware and software, that runs the web &#8230; which, we all know, will expand both our ability to read all kinds of books in digital format <em>and</em> our definition of a &#8220;book.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Our first fight/debate takes place live via webcast on Thursday, Sept. 15 at 10am PT. <a href="http://oreillynet.com/pub/e/2035?cmp=il-radar-webcast-toc-debate-amazon-v-apple">Register for free here</a>. And if you have ideas for publishing debates you&#8217;d like to see, <a href="mailto:kmeyer@oreilly.com">please let me know</a>.</p>
<div style="float: left;border-top: thin gray solid;border-bottom: thin gray solid;padding: 20px;margin: 20px 2px;clear: both"><a href="http://oreillynet.com/pub/e/2035?cmp=il-radar-webcast-toc-debate-amazon-v-apple"><img style="float: left;border: none;padding-right: 10px" src="http://s.radar.oreilly.com/toc-oes.png" /></a><a href="http://oreillynet.com/pub/e/2035?cmp=il-radar-webcast-toc-debate-amazon-v-apple"><strong>TOC Debate: Amazon vs Apple</strong></a> &mdash; What began as a disagreement between colleagues has blossomed into the most fun you can have fighting at work: the TOC Debates. Our first debate, &#8220;Amazon vs. Apple,&#8221; features Joe Wikert and Kassia Krozser.</p>
<p>Join us on Thursday, September 15, 2011, at 10 am PT<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://oreillynet.com/pub/e/2035?cmp=il-radar-webcast-toc-debate-amazon-v-apple"><strong>Register for this free webcast</strong></a></div>
<p></p>
<p><strong>Related:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://oreilly.com/webcasts/">See more upcoming webcasts</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/08/amazon-vs-apple-ebook-toc-debate.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookish Techy Week in Review</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/12/bookish-techy-week-in-review-5.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/12/bookish-techy-week-in-review-5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domino Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kobo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/12/bookish-techy-week-in-review-5.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest Bookish Techy Week in Review: Google ebook store opens; Seth Godin plays with the Domino Project; Kobo launches Reading Life; and IA unveils a new browser-based book reader. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In old-school publishing, days were consumed by three martini lunches. In new-school publishing, days are consumed by launches, and this week was a doozy. (No mention of martinis, but read on):</p>
</p>
<h2>Yes, Virginia there really is a Google eBookstore</h2>
</p>
<p><a href="http://books.google.com/ebooks">Google&#8217;s just-launched eBookstore</a> is not yet available outside the US. According to <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/06/google-ebooks-e-reading-takes-to-the-cloud/">TechCrunch</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>They&#8217;re launching with the support of around either 4,000 or 35,000 publisher partners, depending on how you count. 4,000 is the figure for the US launch, but internationally, they&#8217;re working with the remainder of that figure for a predicted 1Q 2010 launch. All the major publishers are signed on and will be providing a total of around 300,000 in-copyright works, mostly likely including anything you could buy new at any other bookstore.</p>
<p>They also are proud to be working with university, academic, textbook, and professional publishers whose works are harder to come by. They&#8217;ve worked out deals with the American Booksellers Association, Powell&#8217;s, and Alibris as well. By way of a shortcut, I asked if there were any major associations or publishers that Google had not included in at least a basic partnership, and they said no. And of course there is the immense library of public domain works, over two and a half million at the moment, which swells the total Google eBooks count to around three million.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Not to be out-launched, Amazon launched Kindle for the Web</h2>
</p>
<p>Marshall Kirkpatrick of <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kindle_for_the_web_-_sounds_likethe_web_only_for_a.php">ReadWriteWeb</a> is skeptical:</p>
<blockquote><p>You too can now pay $9.99 to read text on a Web page, in Amazon&#8217;s proprietary format, with the graphically limited format of a printed text-only book of yore. Sure, your bookmarks and notes will carry over from the Web pages you&#8217;re reading on to other devices &#8212; but could that possibly be enough to warrant paying for Web-embedded eBooks? I don&#8217;t think so. Once it hits the Web, premium content is only sellable because of scarcity or a superior user experience. I don&#8217;t see either of those being true in this case.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Amazon and Seth Godin launched The Domino Project</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/12/the-domino-project.html">Seth Godin&#8217;s Blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Working with a great team at Amazon, I&#8217;m launching a new publishing venture called <a href="http://www.thedominoproject.com/">The Domino Project</a>. I think it fundamentally changes many of the rules of publishing trade non-fiction.
</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>The fairly less mogul-like Figment launched as well</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://figment.com/">Figment&#8217;s home page</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Figment is a community where you can share your writing, connect with other readers, and discover new stories and authors. Whatever you&#8217;re into, from sonnets to mysteries, from sci-fi stories to cell phone novels, you can find it all here.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Kobo launched Reading Life</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://arts.nationalpost.com/2010/12/09/you-may-never-read-alone-social-media-invades-book-world/">the National Post</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Kobo&#8217;s Reading Life is a new e-reading iPad application that integrates with the company&#8217;s digital bookstore designed to bring social-networking capabilities to the world of electronic books, in a sort of Book Club 2.0.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>James Bridle launched BMXL and the Open Wiki at Open Bookmarks </h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://blog.openbookmarks.org/">the Open Bookmarks blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The latest addition is a proposed XML interchange format for bookmarks &#8212; a very simple, small and powerful thing. At the moment, we&#8217;re still nailing down what we mean by bookmarks and the thorny problems of positioning and identifying books (OpenLibrary?).</p>
<p>The use case is obvious, and because it&#8217;s our first challenge, simple. It&#8217;s also personal, because we believe that the first benefits of Open Bookmarks must be to the individual: social benefits are built on selfish behaviours (there&#8217;s more on this over at <a href="http://booktwo.org/notebook/selfish-vs-social/">Booktwo</a>).
</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>The Internet Archive launched a new browser-based bookreader</h2>
</p>
<p>The updated reader has an improved UI and support for read aloud (TTS).  <a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/originofspecies00darwuoft#page/n5/mode/2up">Here&#8217;s an example</a>.</p>
</p>
<h2>And, Apple launched a rumor of a launch</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/12/ipad-2-february/">Wired&#8217;s Gadget Lab</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Apple has put in the request for its Asian partner Foxconn to produce and ship the second-generation iPad within 100 days, with plans for a spring 2011 release, according to a Taiwanese publication.</p>
<p>Foxconn was notified of plans to ship the iPad by February 2011, with initial shipments of 400,000 to 600,000 units, according to DigiTimes. Sources expect the product to launch April 2011.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Got news?</h2>
</p>
<p>Feel free to <a href="mailto:kmeyer@oreilly.com">send along</a> any news items, blog posts, or things of note from the publishing world.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/12/bookish-techy-week-in-review-5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TOC hosting publishing startup showcase</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/12/toc-hosting-publishing-startup.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/12/toc-hosting-publishing-startup.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOC 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools of change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/12/toc-hosting-publishing-startup.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOC&apos;s first Publishing Showcase will give you -- and your business -- a chance to get in front of hundreds of potential users and investors. Submissions are due by Jan. 10, 2011.  ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year at TOC, we&#8217;re hosting our first ever <a href="http://www.toccon.com/toc2011/public/cfp/145">Publishing Startup Showcase</a>. Highlighting the startup ecosystem&#8217;s creativity and variety, the Showcase will give you a chance to get your company in front of a global community of leaders in the publishing and technology industries &#8212; as well as potential investors.</p>
<p>On Tuesday evening, February 15th, we&#8217;ll have approximately 20 publishing and publishing-related startups demoing in one large room. If your company is chosen to participate, we&#8217;ll provide you with a small table and room for two people to demo &#8212; you&#8217;ll bring a laptop (or two) and a founder (or two).</p>
<p>TOC attendees and a panel of judges from the investor community will have 50 minutes to visit the demos and listen to your pitches. We&#8217;ll sound a chime every five minutes, letting people know it&#8217;s time to circulate. As they walk around, attendees will vote on their favorite demos. At the end of the hour, the judges will announce their top picks, along with the audience favorite. These winning startups will then each give a pitch and have an on-stage conversation with the judges.</p>
</p>
<h2>Here&#8217;s what we&#8217;re looking for:</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li>Relatively young publishing (and publishing-related) startups that aren&#8217;t drowning in investment (yet)</li>
<li>Companies incorporating new technologies and/or innovative business models in their approach to publishing.</li>
</ul>
<p>
<h2>If you&#8217;re selected:</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li>You&#8217;ll supply your own laptop for the demos (we won&#8217;t provide power, so we recommend bringing two laptops)</li>
<li>Wireless Internet access will be available, so web-based demos are okay.</li>
<li>You&#8217;ll bring a maximum of two people (at least one of whom must be a founder or C-level equivalent)</li>
<li>The week prior to the event, you&#8217;ll supply us with a presentation of 2-4 slides that includes screenshots for your onstage pitch in case you are selected</li>
<li>You&#8217;ll receive a complementary TOC Day Pass that will get you into all of Tuesday&#8217;s keynotes, sessions, and events.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-weight: bold"><a href="http://www.toccon.com/toc2011/user/proposal/new/145">Submit your proposal by Jan. 10, 2011.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/12/toc-hosting-publishing-startup.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing TOC Bologna</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/announcing-toc-bologna.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/announcing-toc-bologna.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bologna Children's Book Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOC Bologna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toccon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools of change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/11/announcing-toc-bologna.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOC Bologna, a one-day conference being held in conjunction with the Bologna Children&apos;s Book Fair, will focus on digital and mobile technology.  ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://s.radar.oreilly.com/assets_c/2010/11/bolognacbf-thumb-486x249.gif" border="0" alt="bolognacbf.gif" style="float: right;margin: 3px 0 10px 10px">TOC is hitting the road again, and we could not be more pleased than to be teaming up with the folks at the Bologna Children&#8217;s Book Fair for the first ever TOC Bologna. Details below, with more to come soon. Be sure to follow <a href="http://twitter.com/tocbologna">@TOCBologna</a> for tweeted updates and info</p>
</p>
<h2>From the official press release:</h2>
</p>
<p>O&#8217;Reilly Media and the <a href="http://www.bolognachildrensbookfair.com">Bologna Children&#8217;s Book Fair</a> today announce the first Tools of Change for Publishing event at the Bologna Children&#8217;s Book Fair. TOC Bologna will be a one day conference held on <strong>Sunday 27 March 2011</strong>, focusing on digital and mobile technology. This new collaboration between O&#8217;Reilly Tools of Change and the Bologna Book Fair unites two well-known and professional event organizers to produce an inspirational conference. TOC Bologna will be a landmark event for children&#8217;s publishers, agents, writers and international book people who are looking for the best speakers and insight into this new digital era.</p>
</p>
<p>Andrew Savikas, VP of Digital Initiatives at O&#8217;Reilly Media:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Tools of Change for Publishing events have helped define the agenda for publishers seeking to understand the impact of digital and mobile technology on reading and the business of publishing. The mobile web is driving fundamental changes in modes of reading and sharing, and few audiences will adopt those new modes more quickly than digital natives coming of age immersed in that mobile web. We&#8217;re thrilled to be working with the Bologna Children&#8217;s Book Fair to bring the TOC message to the children&#8217;s book industry.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Roberta Chinni, Project Manager for the Bologna Bookfair:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Bologna Children&#8217;s Book Fair is the top meeting place for the children&#8217;s book industry. We are delighted to be working with O&#8217;Reilly Media on this new conference. We aim to offer a lively and profitable debate on the issues that the industry is facing. It is fantastic to start 2011 with a conference about the digital book world so that we can explore the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Tickets go on sale Jan. 1, 2011. To receive more program information please email <a href="mailto:tocbologna@bolognafiere.it">tocbologna@bolognafiere.it</a></p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/announcing-toc-bologna.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookish Techy Week in Review</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-4.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-4.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest Bookish Techy Week in Review: Berners-Lee defends the web; Amazon launches Kindle book gifting; Cooks Source folds; and Hachette Livre comes to an agreement with Google. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In bookish-techy news this week:</p>
</p>
<h2>Tim Berners-Lee defends the web</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=long-live-the-web"><em>Scientific American</em>:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>A neutral communications medium is the basis of a fair, competitive market economy, of democracy, and of science. Debate has risen again in the past year about whether government legislation is needed to protect net neutrality. It is. Although the Internet and Web generally thrive on lack of regulation, some basic values have to be legally preserved.</p></blockquote>
</p>
<h2>Amazon continues quest to dominate the world by innovating and making customers happy</h2>
</p>
<p>
<ul>
<li>Amazon Kindle tops <a href="http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2010/06/cr_kindle.html#ixzz15k6AJhvO">Consumer Reports</a> ratings.</p>
</li>
<p>
<li>Amazon acquires <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1498303&amp;highlight=">Toby Press</a> literary fiction list.</p>
</li>
<p>
<li>Amazon gives the gift of <a href="http://srph.it/b0MHwm">gifting Kindle books</a>.</li>
</p>
</ul>
<h2>Copyright-challenged Cooks Source calls it a day</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://techland.com/2010/11/17/cooks-source-magazine-controversy-episode-3-the-editor-strikes-back/#ixzz15kApMFjP">Techland</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Whether or not the intentions of the angry Internet mob was to tear down a local publication or not, the Cooks Source Magazine controversy has forced the magazine to fold. In an interview with the <a href="http://www.gazettenet.com/2010/11/17/cooks-source-calls-it-quits?SESS6f0fd580e4826fca3478dc794135dde4=gnews">Daily Hampshire Gazette</a>, Griggs tells the reporter that the free magazine is done for. The November 2010 issue will be the last publication.<br />
&#8220;The name is compromised, big time,&#8221; Griggs said.
</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>paidContent urges media industries to create their own disruption</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-create-your-own-disruption-to-avoid-media-meltdown/">paidContent</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is now clear that the same digitization process will eventually transform all industries, that companies lose control of their customers when new technology enables them to interact with products&#8230;You may well have heard it before, but to respond to disruption you really need to become your own disruption.  To do this you need to identify the disruption that needs harnessing (like banks did with telephone banking) not just fight it (like the music industry did with file sharing).</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Hachette Livre moves forward with Google</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/135089-hachette-livre-and-google-herald-new-french-books-deal.html">The Bookseller</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hachette Livre has come to an agreement with Google that will see the giant search engine digitise the publisher&#8217;s out of print books in France, bringing to an end a long-running dispute stemming from Google&#8217;s vast book digitisation project. The deal will now be subject to six months &#8216;fine-tuning&#8217;, and will also be made available to other French publishers.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Indie press Gaspereau partners with D+M to deliver &#8220;The Sentimentalists&#8221; to the masses.</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.quillandquire.com/google/article.cfm?article_id=11586">Quill and Quire</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>When asked if he is afraid of letting down Gaspereau partisans, who championed the company&#8217;s right to release the now much in-demand title at their own slow-and-steady pace, Steeves doesn&#8217;t miss a beat. &#8220;We have stuck to our guns,&#8221; he says. &#8220;We&#8217;ve picked partners that fit our philosophy, [who do] creative and original works. The most important principle here is to serve the text and to serve the author, and that&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve done. [D&amp;M] is going to take good care of Johanna and get a quality edition out there. That&#8217;s all that matters.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Agent Ari Emanuel ready to disintermediate publishing</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-super-agent-ari-emanuel-hugs-it-out-in-silicon-valley/l">paidContent</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I definitely don&#8217;t think i have to go to Knopf. I don&#8217;t think I have to go to Simon &amp; Schuster for the book business. So I think that&#8217;s going to be a very contentious conversation,&#8221; he said. &#8220;They might just get hardcover (rights), but I don&#8217;t know yet.&#8221; </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Got news?</h2>
</p>
<p>Feel free to <a href="mailto:kmeyer@oreilly.com">send along</a> any news items, blog posts, or things of note from the publishing world.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookish Techy Week in Review</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tocwir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-3.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest Bookish Techy Week in Review: Safran Foer&apos;s latest book is a true work of art; literary magazines are making a webby comeback; Jay-Z&apos;s memoir takes pre-pub publicity to new heights; and Richard Nash&apos;s Cursor posts a peek at the Red Lemonade list. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In bookish-techy news this week:</p>
</p>
<h2>Jonathan Safran Foer pubs crazy new book that can&#8217;t be digitized</h2>
<p><p><a href="http://visual-editions.com/"><em>Tree of Codes</em></a>, produced with British publishers <a href="http://visual-editions.com/">Visual Editons</a> is a book that simply can&#8217;t be digitized because it has a different die cut on every page. </p>
</p>
<h2>The literary magazine returns</h2>
</p>
<p>Thanks to the Internet, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2010/nov/10/literary-magazine-technology-internet">literary magazines</a> are flourishing.</p>
</p>
<h2>Jay-Z pulls off an awesome book promotion</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://creativity-online.com/news/behind-the-work-decoded/146854">Creativity Online</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The campaign made an opening splash at the Delano in Miami &#8212;  a page was fully reproduced on the bottom of the hotel pool, with footnotes imprinted on towels strewn across the surrounding lounge chairs. While the words appear for real on the street, those who don&#8217;t have access to the locations can find them via a unique application/game that Droga5 developed using Microsoft&#8217;s Bing. Visitors to the site get daily clues, researchable via a Bing overlay, which will lead them to where the pages are, albeit virtually in Bing Maps.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Still no consensus where e-lending is concerned</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_your_local_library_lend_e-books_or_can_they.php">ReadWriteWeb</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; according to some publishers, if libraries start lending e-books, it could serve to &#8220;undo the entire market for e-book sales.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>What happens when the libraries die?</h2>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/digital-underclass-what-happens-when-the-libraries-die/14554">Jason Perlow</a> considers the creation of digital underclass:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Libraries will need to be replaced with digital equivalents as publishing moves towards eBooks. As a result, will a new &#8220;Digital Underclass&#8221; be created from the base of technology have-nots?</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Richard Nash previews Cursor with &#8220;A Red Lemonade Sampler&#8221;</h2>
</p>
<p>From <a href="http://rnash.com/article/a-red-lemonade-sampler1/">Richard Nash&#8217;s blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a matter of weeks, links like I&#8217;m about to offer will be offered on Red Lemonade, but I didn&#8217;t want to wait to share these little digital objects with you.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>David Pogue really likes the new Galaxy tablet</h2>
</p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/technology/personaltech/11pogue.html">New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Samsung sweated the details on this thing. The screen is gorgeous. The touch response is immediate and reliable. The whole thing is superfast and a pleasure to use.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Ebooks to Join The New York Times Best-Seller List</h2>
</p>
<p>Also from the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/books/11list.html">New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The lists will be compiled from weekly data from publishers, chain bookstores, independent booksellers and online retailers, among other sources.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Got news?</h2>
</p>
<p>Feel free to <a href="mailto:meyer@oreilly.com">send along</a> any news items, blog posts, or things of note from the publishing world.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/bookish-techy-week-in-review-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open question: Do you trust market research surveys?</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/open-question-do-you-trust-mar.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/open-question-do-you-trust-mar.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openquestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/11/open-question-do-you-trust-mar.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the publishing industry is inundated with statistics about user behavior, how do we determine if the reported numbers are accurate, and whether they are meaningful? ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://s.radar.oreilly.com/open-question-logo.png" border="0" alt="open question" style="float: right;margin: 3px 0 10px 10px">As recently as last year, actual information about ebook consumers was nearly impossible to come by. But lately, throw a virtual rock in any direction and you&#8217;re likely to hit an ereading or ebook research report. Just yesterday <a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/james_mcquivey/10-11-08-ebooks_ready_to_climb_past_1_billion">Forrester released their latest such report</a>, including very reportable and re-tweetable highlights such as:</p>
<ul>
<li> 2010 will end with $966 million in ebooks sold to consumers.</li>
<li> By 2015, the industry will have nearly tripled to almost $3 billion, a point at which the industry will be forever altered.</li>
<li> Current ebook readers in the survey expect an average of 51 percent of the books they read will be ebooks</li>
<li> Four in 10 people who own or expect to buy an ereader shop at Amazon for physical books.</li>
<li> Exactly 50 percent of people who bought an ebook in the past month have bought ebooks from Amazon&#8217;s Kindle store.</li>
</ul>
<p>On the same day, French management consultants <a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/133516-digital-sales-worth-25-of-market-by-2015.html">Bain + Company</a> reported that by 2015 between 15-20 percent of the book reading public will own electronic devices, and up to 25 percent of books will be sold in digital form. This nice sound bite was included with their press release: &#8220;Experimenting with new formats &#8212; non-linear, hybrid, interactive or social &#8212; is where opportunity lies.&#8221;</p>
<p>These are just the tips of the e-iceberg. The data and research are coming at an unprecedented pace from all manner of organizations, associations, private firms, and individuals.</p>
<p>Studies are great. Data is awesome. The ebook market has gone without much of either for far too long. But, could it be that in our thirst for consumer ereading information, we&#8217;re drinking down all this newly available data without stopping to check exactly what&#8217;s in it? The temptation with market research is to read the cherry-picked bullet points and stop there. We need to look closer. Sometimes the small print says a whole lot more than the sound bites. It&#8217;s important to understand the methodology behind the results, including factors such as:</p>
<ul>
<li> How well-defined is the target population?</li>
<li> Is the sample being studied random?</li>
<li> How did the research group chose its random sample?</li>
<li> Was the sample size large enough to produce meaningful results?</li>
<li> Are the questions unbiased?</li>
</ul>
<p>We&#8217;ve <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/08/is-your-survey-data-lying-to-y.html">banged lightly on this drum before</a>, but we thought it&#8217;d be nice, given so many new study summaries being released of late, to open up the topic for discussion.</p>
<p>So here goes:</p>
<p style="font-weight: bold;color: #990000">Do you trust market research surveys? What would you need to know in order to make a key business decision based on survey results?</p>
<p>Feel free to chime in through the comments area. You&#8217;re also welcome to join us on Thursday during our first <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?mostPopular=&amp;gid=104765&amp;goback=.gmp_104765">TOC LinkedIn Open House discussion</a>, hosted by BookSwim.com&#8217;s <a href="http://www.jeevanpadiyar.com">Jeevan Padiyar</a>. If you&#8217;re not already a member of TOC&#8217;s LinkedIn Group, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=104765">it&#8217;s easy to sign up</a>.</p>
<hr />
<p><em><a href="http://www.toccon.com/toc2011/public/schedule/detail/17491">Also of interest: &#8220;eReading Survey Findings and Research: A Look Behind the Numbers,&#8221; a TOC 2011 panel to be moderated by Sarah Weinman.<br />
</a></em></p>
<hr />
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/open-question-do-you-trust-mar.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TOC 2011 preliminary program announced</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/toc-2011-preliminary-program-a.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/toc-2011-preliminary-program-a.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOC 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toccon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/11/toc-2011-preliminary-program-a.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&apos;ve just unveiled the initial list of workshops, sessions, speakers, and events happening at TOC 2011 in February. In addition to traditional book publishers discussing their experiences from the trenches of change, TOC also brings in ideas from the wider global ecosystem. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://en.oreilly.com/toc2011/public/register?cmp=il-radar-tc11-toc11prelim"><img src="http://s.radar.oreilly.com/toc11-promo-radar.png" border="0" alt="TOC 2011" style="float: right;margin: 3px 0 5px 5px"></a>The preliminary program for <a href="http://www.toccon.com/toc2011">Tools of Change 2011</a> is now online.</p>
<p>
In addition to traditional book publishers discussing their experiences from the trenches of change, TOC also brings in ideas from the wider global ecosystem.</p>
<p>
Breakout sessions include:</p>
<ul>
<li> Is There Such a Thing as a Good Business Model for Publishing These Days?</li>
<li> eTextbooks in Higher Education: Practical Findings to Guide the Industry</li>
<li> Can you Afford not to Consider Accessible Publishing Practices?</li>
<li> Data-driven Marketing and Product Development</li>
<li> Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Licensing Issues in the Digital Era</li>
<li> Build a Book API in an Afternoon, Using FluidDB</li>
<li> Improving Your Publishing Metadata and Delivery</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.toccon.com/toc2011/public/schedule">See the rest of the preliminary lineup</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Featured speakers</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> Ben Huh, I Can Has Cheezburger</li>
<li> Margaret Atwood, author and CEO of Syngrafii</li>
<li> Kevin Kelly, founding executive editor of Wired and author of &#8220;What Technology Wants&#8221;</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.toccon.com/toc2011/public/schedule/speakers">See the full list of speakers</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p><em><a href="https://en.oreilly.com/toc2011/public/register?cmp=il-radar-tc11-toc11prelim">Save 15% on TOC 2011 registration with the code &#8220;TOC11RAD&#8221;</a></em></p>
<hr />
<h2>Thank you</h2>
</p>
<p>Our gratitude goes out to the following people who helped review the 200+ proposals, and offered much-appreciated advice on shaping the content for TOC 2011:</p>
<ul>
<li> Patricia Arancibia</li>
<li> Mark Bertils</li>
<li> Peter Brantley</li>
<li> Liza Daly</li>
<li> Kate Eltham</li>
<li> Dedi Felman</li>
<li> José Afonso Furtado</li>
<li> Heather McCormack</li>
<li> Kevin Shockey</li>
<li> Sarah Weinman</li>
<li> Sarah Wendell</li>
</ul>
<h2>We hope to see you in February</h2>
</p>
<p>O&#8217;Reilly Tools of Change for Publishing Conference<br />
February 14-16, 2011<br />
Sheraton New York Hotel &amp; Towers<br />
New York, NY<br />
<a href="http://www.toccon.com">www.toccon.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/toc-2011-preliminary-program-a.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookish Techy Week in Review</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/another-bookish-techy-week-has.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/another-bookish-techy-week-has.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/11/another-bookish-techy-week-has.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest Bookish Techy Week in Review: News of Baker Framework and Scrivener 2.0; the FTC sensibly hires DRM basher Ed Felten; and the agency model gets a six-month evaluation. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another bookish-techy week has come and gone. Along the way, much coolness &#8212; and some not-so-coolness. Read on &#8230;</p>
</p>
<h2>Cool new ways to write and publish</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/11/02/baker-ebook-framework/">Baker Framework</a> &#8212;  cool, free and open source</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php">Scivener 2.0</a> &#8212; not free or open source, but nonetheless cool</li>
</ul>
<h2>The government hires DRM basher Ed Felten</h2>
</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/11/ftcs-first-chief-technologist-drm-basher-ed-felten.ars">Ars Technica</a> sums up the news:</p>
<blockquote><p>Princeton computer science professor Ed Felten today was tapped for a one-year stint at the FTC in a decision so shockingly sane it&#8217;s still a bit hard to believe.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>The Lost Book Sales site launches</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> Authors and publishers lose sales every day. <a href="http://lostbooksales.com">Here&#8217;s why</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>James Bond goes e-bookishly rogue</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/133276-fleming-estate-to-publish-james-bond-e-books.html.rss /">Fleming estate to publish James Bond e-books</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/11/inside-the-google-books-algorithm/65422//">Alexis Madrigal</a> asks &#8220;How does Google Books work?&#8221;</h2>
</p>
<blockquote><p>The system they&#8217;ve come up with has become increasingly sophisticated, as highlighted by their latest tweak, Rich Results &#8230; When you search for a book, Google Books doesn&#8217;t just look at word frequency or how closely your query matches the title of a book. They now take into account web search frequency, recent book sales, the number of libraries that hold the title, and how often an older book has been reprinted.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>
Diesel ebookstore assesses the <a href="http://blog.diesel-ebooks.com/?p=704">Agency Model</a></h2>
</p>
<blockquote><p>In other words, the A5 performed an impressive near-checkmate on the eBook chessboard. And everyone, except for Amazon and perhaps a few authors, is as pleased as punch. Or are they?</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>
Not so cool</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/publishing-industry-fumes-at-local-ibook-launch/story-e6frgakx-1225947334849">Australian iBookstore</a> launches but leaves out a few folks</li>
<li> <a href="http://illadore.livejournal.com/30674.html">Cooks Source and copyright infringement</a>. Related: Edward Champion <a href="http://www.edrants.com/the-cooks-source-scandal-how-a-magazine-profits-on-theft/">breaks down and dig into</a> the Cooks Source story.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Got news?</h2>
</p>
<p>Feel free to <a href="mailto:meyer@oreilly.com">send along</a> any news items, blog posts, or things of note from the publishing world.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/11/another-bookish-techy-week-has.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bookish Techy Week in Review</title>
		<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/bookish-techy-week-in-review-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/bookish-techy-week-in-review-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books in browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wowio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.oreilly.com/radar/2010/10/bookish-techy-week-in-review-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what was a very social bookish-techy week, Books in Browsers inspired much discussion of shared reading; bookish social networks launched - and shuttered; Amazon announced that Kindle will soon be sharing-enabled; and the new color nook was announced. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On occasion, bookish-techy weeks seem to unfold around a theme. This is one of those weeks, and the theme has been &#8220;social.&#8221; Social reading, social networking, being anti-social &#8211; and all in a bookish-techy way. Not to mention, a few Halloween-related items of bookish-techy interest. Read on &#8230;</p>
</p>
<h2>A Bookish-techy &#8220;social&#8221; event</h2>
</p>
<p>This bookish-techy social week actually got to a start last week at the Internet Archive&#8217;s <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/booksinbrowsers">Books in Browsers conference</a>. BiB-related and/or inspired posts of note:</p>
<ul>
<li> Great round-up of BiB recaps, etc. from Gary Price at <a href="http://web.resourceshelf.com/go/resourceblog/61473">Resource Shelf</a></li>
<li> Post-BiB 10 Thoughts from Kassia Krozser at <a href="http://booksquare.com/post-bib10-thoughts-mostly-about-user-experience/#more-3775">BookSquare.com</a></a></li>
<li> At <a href="http://www.themillions.com/2010/10/report-from-the-future-of-reading-the-books-in-browsers-conference.html">The Millions, Patrick Brown weighs in on BiB</a>.</li>
<li> From BookGlutton&#8217;s Aaron Miller, <a href="http://frontmatters.com/2010/10/29/social-publishing/">a definition of social publishing</a>.</li>
<li> And Fran Toolan sums up and surmises it all at NetGalley&#8217;s<br />
<a href="http://followthereader.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/thoughts-on-innovation" />Follow the Reader</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Social networks for teen readers come and go</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8087269/Penguin-to-launch-a-social-network-for-bookworms.html">Penguin gleefully launches a new social network for teens</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://publishingperspectives.com/2010/10/friends-without-benefits-cell-phone-novel-publisher-figment-on-building-social-networks/">Jacob Lewis pulls the plug on Figment&#8217;s failed social network for teens</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Sharing news from Amazon and Wowio</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum/ref=cm_cd_tfp_ef_tft_tp?_encoding=UTF8&amp;cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&amp;cdThread=Tx1G2UIO9PJO50V&amp;displayType=tagsDetail&amp;tag=vglnk-c2-20">Amazon to enable sharing on the Kindle</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20101029005271/en/WOWIO-Issued-Notice-Allowance-Patent-Application-Covering">Wowio doing all it can <em>not </em> to share advertising-supported ebook concept</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>New Nook not news?</h2>
</p>
<p>So says <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/10/26/nice-knowing-you-nook/">CrunchGear</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The last thing the world needs right now is another Android tablet, especially when the focus for e-readers should be on distinguishing them from tablets and not trying to compete with more capable and connected devices. Amazon is already neck-deep in Kindle sales, and this gamble by Barnes &amp; Noble essentially forfeits their portion of this generation of e-readers.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>In honor of a Bookish-Techy Halloween</h2>
</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304173704575578241730802982.html?mod=WSJ_Books_LS_Books_7"> Stephen King on why ebooks aren&#8217;t scary</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://publishingperspectives.com/2010/10/behold-it-lives-frankentext-or-how-textbook-publishing-got-scary/">Eric Frank, co-founder of Flat World Knowledge on how text book publishing got so scary</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=104601&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+mr%2Ffront+%28MobileRead+Frontpage%29"> Mobile Read&#8217;s ereader giveaway more treat than trick</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/bookish-techy-week-in-review-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>