Wed

Jul 19
2006

Tim O'Reilly

Tim O'Reilly

When Amateurs Roamed the Earth

A lovely NY Times article entitled The Art of Drawing, When Amateurs Roamed the Earth describes an exhibition of selections from "the more than 145,000 drawing manuals" that circulated from 1820 to 1860, and from "that golden era, from the time of the founding fathers...when educated Americans drew as a matter of course." The article continues:

We’re addicted to convenience today. Cellphone cameras are handy, but they’re also the equivalent of fast-food meals. Their ubiquity has multiplied our distance from drawing as a measure of self-worth and a practical tool. Before box cameras became universal a century or so ago, people drew for pleasure but also because it was the best way to preserve a cherished sight, a memory, just as people played an instrument or sang if they wanted to hear music at home because there were no record players or radios. Amateurism was a virtue, and the time and effort entailed in learning to draw, as with playing the piano, enhanced its desirability.

That is by contrast with today's culture, in which:

With the arts, American adults have acquiesced to playing the passive role of receivers....So it is with classical music, painting and drawing, professional renditions of which are now so widely available that most people probably can’t or don’t imagine there’s any point in bothering to do these things themselves. Communities of amateurs still thrive, but they are self-selecting groups. A vast majority of society seems to presume that culture is something specialists produce.

Now, obviously Make: magazine shows just how vibrant the DIY movement still is, even if drawing, playing piano, and similar activities are no longer front and center. And while classical music is a specialist thing, popular music remains something that is widely practiced (albeit not as widely as in its heyday.) But the article is still a good reminder is how much we lose when we simply consume, and forget how to produce.


tags:   | comments: 10   | Sphere It
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/4798

Comments: 10

  Mark Petrovic [07.19.06 01:08 PM]

As for the list of things we still do for ourselves (at times), don't forget open source. Benkler considers it a form of folk art

http://dream.sims.berkeley.edu/~jhall/Yochai_Benkler_Boalt_27Apr2006.mp3

  Tracy Rolling [07.19.06 02:46 PM]

One obvious exception to this is photography and video. With cheap digital cameras, people are out there creating pictures and movies who never would have done it before.

  PeterMHoward [07.19.06 08:55 PM]

I'm not sure about this quote:

"Cellphone cameras are handy, but they're also the equivalent of fast-food meals. Their ubiquity has multiplied our distance from drawing as a measure of self-worth and a practical tool."

2 reasons:

  1. as Tracy said, "people are out there creating pictures and movies who never would have done it before."
  2. smacks of Drawing is Art, photography isn't... I think the ubiquity of cameras (even just the basic camera phones, which are improving in quality all the time) allows people to experiment with creative 'art', and some basic form of self-expression

Somehow I find it hard to believe that people now just consume culture, whereas somehow everyone then was creating it...? I don't see an ubiquity of drawing correlating with widespread creation of culture; similarly with music: people might have learnt to play an instrument, but most of those simply played music written by someone else...

And finally: sites like flickr and deviantart still demonstrate the 'desirability of amateurism' -- these are largely amateur artists, but there's some amazing creative art on there

-p

  Tim O'Reilly [07.19.06 09:51 PM]

Peter and Tracy -- You're absolutely right that there is always a tendency to romanticize the past and denigrate the present, which I let the article pull me into a bit. There is amazing stuff going on today with digital cameras and digital video. And as Mark points out, there are new crafts, like software.

But I do think that the point of the article was that drawing was a skill that was expected of any educated person, not just enthusiasts. I don't think you could say that about either photography or programming or music today. While there are many accomplished enthusiasts, I'll bet that there is a difference in the overall expectations of what ordinary people should be able to do.

(Personally, I've always wished I'd taken the time to learn to draw well. I have some friends who I travel with from time to time, and am always envious of their sketches and watercolors.)

  PeterMHoward [07.20.06 01:12 AM]

"that drawing was a skill that was expected of any educated person, not just enthusiasts" -- very true Tim; but I think the change is a result of widespread education (ie, to people who don't have/can't afford the leisure time) more than anything else... so I don't think those educated people were the same as today's "ordinary people"

you are onto something though: that today's education tends to neglect the arts... there really isn't a good reason for school education *not* to include a love of creative art... I do see technology (eg, digital cameras) going someways to correct that, at least

-p

  Frank Shaw [07.21.06 06:07 AM]

I think one of the drivers of this is the expectation of perfection and expertise. Itprevents people from even trying -- if the goal is only to be good, and society rewards expertise above all else, why invest the time?

There is a value to the journey, and I think we've lost sight of that.

  Morgan [07.24.06 06:29 AM]

I do think that the point of the article was that drawing was a skill that was expected of any educated person, not just enthusiasts.

  csven [07.24.06 07:13 AM]

I often wonder how much of all of this - from drawing to video - is viewed from the perspective of merely being a consumable and nothing more. For me that's a huge issue in a society that arguably needs to cut back on consumption in general.

  Search Engine Web [07.26.06 01:50 PM]

Even with Popular music, training has been replaced by sampling, synthesizers and digital editing to filter out any imperfections, including vocal imperfections.

And Illustrator has become embraced by those whose professions would require hand drawing just a couple of decades ago.

Even with professional photography and videography, the ease of which Photo and video editing tools have been embraced, has had an effect on style and technique. The decades of mastering complex mood lighting and subtle shadings just can not be reproduced with photoshop and the bunch.

  Marvin Bartel [08.24.07 06:45 AM]

Drawing as a basic ability is NOT being taught well in most US schools. There are effective practice and learning methods that can help one become much better at good obersvation and rendering, at becoming more imaginative, inventive, and to illustrate explanations to self and others. With appropriate modifications, these methods of learning and right brain development and visual thinking work with preschoolers, in kindergarten, and the early grades; but these proven methods are hardly ever taught until college drawing classes for art students.

I have found many mistakes and many new ideas by drawing before acting. It is not unusual to spend five hours drawing to prepare for five minutes of action. These rough drafts in the form of drawings can save days of wasted efforts on dead ends and mistakes.

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






Type the characters you see in the picture above.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

RECENT COMMENTS