Tue

Jan 30
2007

Tim O'Reilly

Tim O'Reilly

Energy Innovation In the News

At O'Reilly, we like to think we're focused on early adopters. But two New York Times articles yesterday, Tech Barons Take on Energy Policy and Silicon Valley Rebounds, Led by Green Technology, suggest we're right in the middle of a tidal wave with our new Energy Innovation Conference. I'm a bit nervous with all this investor focus that some of the worldchanging approaches to energy generation, storage, distribution, conservation, and use that might emerge from non-commercial players might be overshadowed by hype and hungry VCs.

But this topic is so important that we want to get into the middle of it. It seems to me that many of the energy innovations we're looking for are also computer innovations. Hybrid autos, for example, are as much a software innovation as they are an energy innovation.

We like to think that our audience has a lot to offer -- and in fact we were inspired to launch this conference because we were seeing more and more people we run into turning from internet-enabled social media to the question of where the power to operate those Web 2.0 sites is going to come from. At a recent internal developer conference at a major Web 2.0 company, a surprising amount of time was spent discussing where to site new data centers for the cheapest power.

But while energy got our attention because of the dependency of our industry on it, we aren't just looking for innovations that directly affect the computer industry or create new opportunities for it. My hope is that we'll uncover people with surprising new approaches, people who will wake up "the usual suspects." My model is our Where 2.0 Conference, which brought together old-timers from the GIS industry and people from the world of mashups, open source geo, and the like. One attendee made my day when he said, "I've been going to these kinds of conferences for years, and it's always like old home week. But here, I'm saying, 'Who are all these people?'" We managed to bring together people who'd not otherwise have had a chance to meet and cross-fertilize ideas.

Related Radar Posts. Related Makezine posts.


tags: energy  | comments: 3   | Sphere It
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/5194

Comments: 3

  BillyG [01.30.07 01:10 PM]

I just got the latest CRN in the mail today:

IT'S EASIER to be GREEN

Just another scary example of mass media coming at us from all sides, albeit for a good cause this time.

  Paul B [01.31.07 09:20 AM]

Tim,

I haven't read TFA (yet), but I can say that a fellow named Amory Lovins was making a good deal of sense on these topics (particularly, readily gained efficiency versus increased production capacity, resulting flatter production variations, etc.) twenty years ago. Back then, he was able to convince, for example, an Iowa power utility of the wisdom of this advice, to their benefit.

I wasn't sure he was still around, but I saw his name mentioned just the other day. I'd suggest giving him a call, for a dose of the straight poop. Rocky Mountain Institute, outside of Aspen.

Regards

  Jim Stogdill [02.03.07 04:11 PM]

The Jan 22 New Yorker magazine has an interesting profile of Amory Lovin titled "Mr. Green." It was an interesting read.

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






Type the characters you see in the picture above.