Mon

Mar 5
2007

Tim O'Reilly

Tim O'Reilly

The Blonde Correction

We usually ignore most of the submissions to radar by PR agencies, but this one caught my eye. Chris Macowski wrote in:

On Thursday, February 22 (two trading days before the market drop), CNBC anchor Dylan Ratigan led his show Fast Money (8:00 pm ET) by predicting the market was due for a big drop, as a result of the so called "Blonde Correction," citing traders' obsession with Anna Nicole Smith and Britney Spears.

"If people have time to worry about this we are in trouble," Ratigan said to lead his show. Ratigan went on to cite a raft of complacency statistics, including the longest streak of consecutive up months in the U.S. stock market since 1953.

Ratigan's traders scoffed at the blonde correction theory - in fact, Jeff Macke called him a "whiner", but only two trading days after Ratigan's blonde-based prediction on Fast Money, the US stock market fell more than 400 points on February 27, its worst day since 9/11!"

Here's a link to a page with the video of Ratigan's "Blonde Correction" segment.

What I found interesting about this is how much it tells us about faint signals and how the mind sees patterns. What we call intuition is often something we recognize but don't quite have a conscious story for. Rattigan seems to me to have picked up on the "blonde" connection mostly as a good headline for his show segment, but he had a real point to make. In fact, we all look for hooks on which to hang things that we know, but can't prove. (That explains, I think, the enduring popularity of astrology and other oracles among people who ought to know better: their "predictions" are so broad and ambiguous that they become like a mirror in which we can see (and say) something that we know by other means.)

And how right he is about there being trouble ahead for a culture that cares more about Anna Nicole Smith and Britney Spears than about Iraq or the economy.


tags:   | comments: 2   | Sphere It
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/5301

Comments: 2

  Mikael Bergkvist [03.05.07 05:14 PM]

Seriously, who's suprised by this, really?
You have all these kids from broken homes that uses their sexuality to attract attention, so it's no wonder this generation went to hell.
Then, on the other hand, we then got the control freaks, who got to say "What did we say? Family values" and "Lets bomb a country", and then promptly drove the family car off a cliff with us all in it.

Extremes shaped this period of our civilisation, and that's never a good thing.
We rocked the boat this way, and then that way, and then..

  Kevin Farnham [03.06.07 08:13 PM]

Tim, your definition of "intuition" is interesting. I spent thousands of hours devising algorithms for trading the stock market, and my algorithms did very well when I was actively trading. But there were other times when, as I paid close attention to each day's market news, I just "felt" like something was going to happen.

I don't trade at all anymore (I pay college bills instead) -- but a few weeks ago I saw an article in the Wall Street Journal saying that market volatility had become unusually low. And instantly, since the market has done nothing but rise recently, my mind said "uh-oh, watch out!"

But I can't say this was pure intuition, because I remember other "eerie silences" from the past -- how very often they were followed by a sudden, very unexpected lurch (usually in opposite direction from what's happened lately). I never had the time to try to quantify this. My guess is that it's somehow related to the association between stock market volatility and Power Laws...

Until we can put a name on something, or bound it within a mathematical equation, it remains mysterious -- even if this time the intuition indeed turns out to have been the result of an ascertained but unnamed signal that correctly forecasts a future event.

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






Type the characters you see in the picture above.