Which One Was More Virtual?
I just saw an interesting photo of myself in the Second Life version of Sun's press conference announcing open source Java. Here's the twist: I wasn't at the conference. My comments were filmed by Sun in my hotel room at the Web 2.0 Conference a few days in advance, as I wasn't going to be able to attend the actual event. So my question is this: which is more virtual? My video comments at the actual Sun conference, or Jonathan Schwartz's avatar presentation in Second Life? In Second Life, even live participants were present only on the video screen, some on video and some with avatar. Some participants were time-shifted, and others were live. Meanwhile, I caught this image in someone's flickr photo stream, and other people have since watched the press conference on YouTube or as an audio stream, in which case even the live participants were now merely disk representations.
You can have events that are virtual but live, and events that are live but virtual, and virtual events that have both canned and live content, and in this digital world, even live eventually becomes frozen in time.

tags:
| comments: 2
| Sphere It
submit:
Subscribe to Comments on this Entry:
0 TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/5105
Comments: 2
Well, then there was the pre-show. I think someone else was driving Shuttleworth's avatar; they thought I was someone else at the time. During the actual event, I expect it was Shuttleworth there.
So - theoretically - I could show up looking like G.W. Bush as an avatar with enough media hype, toss out a few phrases about Iraq, and probably even answer questions about the doggycam in the White House.
The virtual veil will have to be lifted now and then... and that's where the video can come in to demonstrate, verily, this is the right person. But that can be faked too.
It basically comes down to space and time. You are either there or not there in the physical world, and participating in real time or checking in later:
present/remote and synchronous/asynchronous
In education for example, in a traditional classroom with a teacher and students in a room at the same time, you have: present+synchronous.
If some students on another campus are watching and participating via a realtime AV connection, you have remote+synchronous.
If someone watches a recording of the lecture later at home, perhaps reading and posting comments, you have remote+asynchronous.
I suppose there is not much point in being present and viewing the event later (present+asynchronous), unless there is something in the physical space that people need to see/touch/smell in person.
Post A Comment:
RECENT COMMENTS
- Tbone on Which One Was More Virtual?: It basically comes down...
- Taran Rampersad on Which One Was More Virtual?: Well, then there was th...

