Want A Job? Learn SharePoint, Says Gary Blatt

100% of the Federal Government has licenses, but they can't find developers to implement their sites.

You may also download this file. Running time: 16:36

Subscribe to this podcast series via iTunes. Or, visit the O'Reilly Media area at iTunes to find other podcasts from O'Reilly.

Even with an improving economy, there’s still a lot of developers out there who are looking for work. And though it may make seasoned Open Source hackers cringe at the thought, one quick way to find employment may be to go over to “the Other Side” and become a Microsoft SharePoint developer. I recently attended the SPTechCon conference, and talked to Gary Blatt, founder and current board member of the Washington D.C. Sharepoint Users Group, about the overwhelming demand for SharePoint-savvy developers, especially in the federal government. We also discussed Vivek Kundra, the new Federal CIO, and the things that Gary likes and dislikes most about SharePoint.

James Turner: For those people who might not be familiar with it, why don’t you start by describing exactly what SharePoint is.

Gary Blatt: Sure. At the highest level, Microsoft’s vision for SharePoint is as a collaborative tool. That word ‘collaboration’ means a lot of things to a lot of different people, but at a certain level, it means teams of people, groups of people, more than one, working together, whether they be on office documents or other types of material in a collaborative fashion. SharePoint is also seen as a portal-type application that allows you to bring disparate systems together into a one-stop shop type of environment.

James Turner: Now in D.C., obviously, your biggest customer there is going to be the federal government.

Gary Blatt: Absolutely.

James Turner: I heard you say yesterday that 100 percent of the federal government has SharePoint licenses. Is that through some GSA deal or is it individual purchases?

Gary Blatt: I’m not familiar with the exact details of the sales, but I know that in August of 2007, the figure that was released was 92 percent. And, obviously, it’s been almost a couple years since then, so I don’t think it was one fell swoop that they did it, all under one GSA contract. But Microsoft sales people, obviously, were pretty proficient in pushing the product out into the federal government space.

James Turner: I also heard you say, though, that only about 30 percent of the agencies are using it. Why do you think that there is a lag in adoption there?

Gary Blatt: A good percentage of that lag in adoption is not for want of wanting to do it. The buzz, quite frankly, is tremendous. I interact with a lot of agencies in addition to the one I might be currently contracting with. And the buzz is, “When can we do SharePoint?” I go to my user group meetings and you meet people from many different federal agencies that are like, “Well, we have the license for SharePoint, but we don’t have anybody to execute it for us or help us with it.” And that is the prime motivating factor, that there’s this huge demand for SharePoint resources and a total lack of supply.

James Turner: We have a new CTO for the federal government that President Obama has appointed. He’s known to have somewhat of a penchant for open source, but also he’s known as a take-charge guy. He was the CTO for the District of Columbia before he went on board.

Gary Blatt: Correct.

James Turner: Have you heard anything about what he was like as the D.C. CTO?

Gary Blatt: Of course, there’s lots of new stories coming out now about previous perceptions. But the perception is that he was a very informed person in his previous role, and that he was also very effective in explaining to the non-technical high-level people that he was interacting with the salient points that mattered, not getting too technically detailed because that’s not the correct audience. So the hope — when it was announced that there was going to be a national position for this, before he was even selected — the hope among the community, the general buzz was that, “Wow, now we have a champion. We have somebody. But they’ve got to pick the right person. If they pick the wrong person who’s going to get in there and try to be a geek and get down to these low level of details about what’s going on with technology in the field, then they’re going to lose the audience just like we do when we deal with clients and we get too technical.” So when it was announced that he was the appointee, there was a great general hoorah, if you will, in that he’s definitely seen as a very efficient advocate for technology in the federal government, being able to communicate at the proper levels the important information.

James Turner: Getting back to SharePoint a little bit, I’ve also heard you talk a lot over the last couple of days about the huge pent up demand there is for SharePoint developers and I guess it’s not only in D.C. but just in general.

Gary Blatt: Basically across the country. I’ve had the opportunity to get exposed to some of that marketplace. I keep my resumes active. I’m a contractor, so I’m always looking for the next gig. Other industries that are jumping on it, other than the federal government, is the legal profession — K Street, down in the D.C. area, of course — as well as all over the country. Larger industries like the healthcare industry, the pharmaceutical industry, again, around the country, and in some cases around the globe, are adopting it because they see the value that it provides in the environment.

James Turner: There’s obviously still a lot of developers out there who are looking for something to do. And certainly there’s a lot of them that don’t have a Microsoft skill set right now. They’re coming out of open source, Java, or some other community. If somebody wanted to try to take advantage of that, first of all, what’s the learning curve and learning path for that? And, second of all, how long would you say it would take for say a 15-year developer to become proficient enough in those technologies to be hirable?

Gary Blatt: Since I’ve had direct experience with that, I can give you an exact anecdote. I worked with a gentleman who had about 12 years of experience in non-Microsoft technologies recently in the Java space. He was exposed to object-oriented in the Java space, but realized when he and I spent a little bit of time chatting, that object-oriented programming in .NET, which is what SharePoint is based on, is very different. So as a trainer myself, the approach that I take or I recommend even if I’m not doing the actual training is don’t spend weeks or months getting all wrapped up in the full details, but spend a little bit of time before you even take a look at SharePoint in refamiliarizing yourself with OO as it relates to the .NET environment. Orient yourself with basic .NET OO policies and procedures. Go out, there’s plenty of resources out on the internet now, .NET’s been out for almost nine years, that can be Googled and looked for to assist you as somebody that’s looking for that. From my perspective, I do not recommend running out and signing up for a SharePoint developer course. You’ll be lost, number one. Number two, you need to have at least some base to take as a starting point. That’s why I say when I start with a one-on-one student, for instance, that has a similar background, this gentleman had 12 years of previous experience, we focused strictly on what are OO principles in the .NET environment. And I gave him some web-based ASPX applications to build as homework. To get his fingers wet, so to speak, in the .NET environment. No, let’s not go through a three-month heavy detailed thing, and then let’s focus on what is a SharePoint developer? That’s another major issue that we have in the environment, is that everybody knows what a .NET developer is or a JAVA developer. You spend the majority of your time writing code. You might get involved in other parts of the SLDC in design and requirements, but you write code. And you produce these pieces of functionality. In SharePoint, because of some of the grey areas involved between development and configuration, it’s not always as clear.

James Turner: Right. I’ve seen a lot of people — just in the examples over the last couple of days — seem to be doing as much point-and-click, drag-and-drop as they were typing.

Gary Blatt: And where the debate comes in on that is how much of that point-and-click, drag-and-drop you want to push down to the end-user level, the power user level, the admin level and so forth. Where a lot of companies and organizations, including some of the government, make a mistake is they see the same type of thing that you got exposed to and they go, “Well, we don’t need the developer. We don’t need any design. I don’t need any governance. I can just get my admins to install this product and I’ll point-and-click my way through it. And I’ll figure it out later.” So it’s flexibility is both a blessing and a curse. It fools people into thinking that you don’t have to do a lot of advanced planning. But as somebody that gets called in to clean up those messes frequently, I can tell you that lack of planning is definitely a major issue. And the companies that say, “Well, I want a standup SharePoint,” or government agencies say, “Okay. Well, go get me SharePoint developers.” They don’t even know what to ask for. In a lot of cases, they’ll take a web developer job req, scratch out web, change it to SharePoint and say, “Here, that’s what I want.” And that’s not accurate.

James Turner: About how long would you say it would take somebody to get to that –

Gary Blatt: Somebody with a solid programming experience, I could care less what that language is, even if they’ve never seen any OO in general — I mean although it helps — even if they’ve never seen any of that. And let’s just take a scenario where they’re working fulltime. They can’t just walk away from their existing revenue stream. So we’re talking basically evenings and weekends. This person that had that 12 years of programming experience took about two-and-a-half months. And he wasn’t 100 percent dedicated. It wasn’t every night; it wasn’t every weekend. But he was a pretty motivated person, quite frankly. And he got a lot of assistance from me. I did a little bit of one-on-one training. I pointed him at the right resources.

James Turner: So you’ve dealt with a lot of SharePoint installations at this point. My experience in a few of the places I’ve worked is it’s essentially plopped down by ITs. Somebody does a quick little hierarchy or a taxonomy and then they hand it off to the users or there’ll be like one guy in every group who becomes the SharePoint guy. And you end up with this amorphous blob. Nobody has the right permissions to do anything.

Gary Blatt: It is endemic to the platform. Remember, now, SharePoint was first released in 2000, as STS, SharePoint Team Services. So it’s been around nine years. In our industry, that’s a tremendous amount of time. But yet, the level of education is pretty low. No matter how intelligent the people are, it’s not really based on that. It’s based on what they’re exposed to. SharePoint is a very different platform. It’s not your father’s web, so to speak. And I am exposed to what you just described more often than I’d like to be because there is no planning. People, either because of budgets or lack of understanding or lack of education or just sheer stupidity, to a degree, I hate to say it that crass, but the bottom line is that they say, “Well, my admin installed it.” Because all you’ve got to do to a default install is “next, next, next.” You could install SharePoint, you know?

James Turner: Right.

Gary Blatt: It’s right after the install that you have to do like 10 to 20 administration steps to get it ready to run. And nobody does those. They just ignore that. As a quick example, I’ll leave the name out. But a large, large organization, a 22,000 user deployment, never looked at the search configuration and left it in the out-of-the-box mode. Therefore, they went live into production with it set up to reindex their content on an incremental basis every ten minutes. But because of the size of their thing, it took more than ten minutes for that to happen. So every ten minutes it would interrupt the existing process to reindex. And their indexes never got updated.

James Turner: Sounds like a deadly embrace.

Gary Blatt: Exactly. And they had no clue. They did a lot of other things right, you know? But search was not part of their governance. And they did a lot of things right. There’s companies that don’t even know what the word governance means in a context of this. And people love to pick on Microsoft and make fun of them and all of that. But you know what? In some regards, they have made huge efforts with SharePoint because they recognize some of these problems. When you go out to the Microsoft sites that are available, both technical and non-technical, there is planning worksheets. There are documents, how to plan for your deployment, SharePoint governance checklists.

They’ve done a much better job than in the earlier days of making it easier if you A) know to look for it and B) take the time to look for it and do the planning. But in a lot of cases, especially in a government space, the government as a client says, “You have three weeks to get this up and running.” Well, it takes three weeks for the scope of what they’re talking about to just do the governance. “Well, sorry. No time for governance. Just get it up and running. We’ll worry about it later.” And that’s why there are some people in the technical community that get exposed to that and go, “I want nothing to do with SharePoint.” That’s ridiculous, you know? “I’m a developer. I write code.” Or, “I’m an administrator. I do all this important stuff.” And when they see what’s happened in other environments, they don’t get what its potential is.

James Turner: So if you had to pick one favorite and one least favorite thing about SharePoint, what would it be?

Gary Blatt: I’d say that my favorite part of it is the concept that when done correctly, you can empower lesser employees, whether it’s on a pay scale or a title or whatever you want to say to do anywhere from 30 to 50 percent of what you’re paying higher level people to do. Some people see that as a negative because they think it’s going to put people out of work, but it’s just the opposite. It allows those higher level people to do the more important things and give less support issues to the higher level people. Plus, the lower level people can now do a lot more work. On the down side, it is almost the same thing. It’s that level of flexibility.

As a quick example, in the latest version, 2007 that came out in late 2006, Microsoft added item level security. That means that an individual who either added a piece of data or uploaded a document has the rights to change the security so that only select people can see that. They’re the owner of that. On one hand, that’s very empowering. On the other hand, you get 300 support calls sometimes because Bob and Sally can’t see the document and Sue down the hall can, so why can’t I see it? And there aren’t a lot of great administrative tools yet to handle that type of thing. So its great power is also sometimes a great liability.

James Turner: If I had to vote, it would be the wiki.

Gary Blatt: Yeah. But let’s face facts, in my personal opinion, the blog and the wiki were thrown in, of course this was in 2006 while they were still working on it, in the ’07 version because social computing was just coming up. Just like when Mr. Gates woke up in 1995 and went, “Oh, what’s this internet thing?” You know? They realized they were missing the boat on social computing. And blogs and wikis were the two hottest thing in ’05-’06 timeframe. So without a thought to true functionality and implementation, they threw them in there and said, “See, we’re doing that. We’ve got that covered.” They’re making promises that 2010 will change that. They’ve had time to think about it and so forth. But you’re right, it’s frustrating because end-users see that and they know what blogs and wikis do outside of SharePoint and think, “Oh, I can have that in my SharePoint environment? That’s pretty cool.” Then they go to create one and they realize it’s not even close to cool.

James Turner: Why don’t you end by talking a little bit about your user’s group and how people can get involved with it?

Gary Blatt: Sure. The user’s group was founded almost four years ago. I was living and working in the D.C. area so that was the geographical focus. Although as my jobs and my living arrangements changed, we chose to move the meeting groups out into the Reston area, which is a suburb of D.C.. The meetings are the second Thursday of every month. Typically, we might have a holiday skip, but in general, we meet all 12 months of the year. The main website where you can get information about our meetings is SUGDC.org (SUGDC for SharePoint Users Group of D.C. .org). And not only can you get information about the meetings, but we also have a link where you can request access to our SharePoint site which is obviously running on SharePoint and has all of the resources, the documents and the tips from users and all of this other valuable information that we provide as a local resource.

You do not have to live in D.C. or attend our meetings to request access to our site. You are more than welcome to request that access. And, of course, on the main public site, we also have information about our upcoming conference. In this case, it’s June 26th and 27th. But we pretty much stick with that date every year. So if you’re hearing this after June 26th, feel free to come by next year.

James Turner: All right. Well, Gary Blatt, thank you so much for taking the time to talk to us.

Gary Blatt: Thank you, James.

tags:

Get the O’Reilly Programming Newsletter

Weekly insight from industry insiders. Plus exclusive content and offers.

  • Barry

    This is a naive question, but what exactly is meant by “governance” in the context of this interview?

  • Ted

    All things considered, I’d prefer to collect unemployment until it ran out over doing this sort of horrific development. I’d actually consider changing professions than be forced into this path to get a paycheck.

    I don’t care how “open” .NET is, it is a miserable environment to work inside of, and that “2 and a half months of offtime learning” could be much better spent learning something new and applicable to the larger enterprise (and computing) audience — RDF, LDAP concepts, AMQP messaging, data warehousing via SQL table partitioning — you name it.

    The last thing the technical world needs is another wave of enterprise intranets built on top of Microsoft ingenuity.

  • carldec

    so… from what i see:

    M$ sharepoint ~= Lotus notes 2009 from M$

    Sorry M$, my kids are not that hungry yet.

  • James Turner

    Barry,
    I believe in this context, governance involves things like who has access to what pages, who can add things where, how often things like indexing are done, etc.

    James

  • John

    I was conducting interviews for a developer position I needed. I was meeting with one candidate. When I described that the role would occasionally updating our internal CMS — basically making a blog posting — the candidate brusquely interrupted me.

    “It’s not Sharepoint, is it? Tell me it isn’t Sharepoint. I can’t ever work on Sharepoint again. Please don’t ask me to work on Sharepoint.”

    I had to spend five minutes reassuring him that there was no Sharepoint involved in any way in the role, period. Only then did he calm down and we were able to continue.

  • David Cartwright

    James

    You have totally ignored the dangers of Microsoft lock-in.

    For example, in May 2009, Microsoft significantly increased the cost of its software for Australian Aged Care providers, in some cases by up to 500%.

    A recent Computerworld article by Darren Pauli has more details:
    http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/tech/9F52A5E565BF195DCC2575C000728F0B

    The dangers of Microsoft lock-in are not something from past history. They still exist because fundamentally Microsoft’s business practices remain tied to a lock-in strategy.

  • James Turner

    David & john,
    I make absolutely no claim for the quality of SharePoint, or its advisability from a corporate perspective. In fact, I suffer with it every day at work and am far from its biggest fan.

    But if you’re a developer with 2.5 kids, watching the end of your unemployment checks roll in, and wondering how the food tastes down at the soup kitchen, swallowing your pride and learning to code a system you may not personally care for isn’t the stupidest decision in the world. Sometimes, you have to go where the money is.

    James

  • bowerbird

    typical government inept bureaucratic money-wasting decision,
    to pay for microsoft software that doesn’t work, everyone hates,
    and they can’t find anyone who wants to program in it or use it.

    and this parasite has managed to infiltrate the host _totally_…

    government 2.0 is broken; suggest immediate upgrade to 2.2.

    -bowerbird

  • David

    I think the MSFT/SP haters are funny…

    Want to see a real SharePoint website?

    http://www.ferrari.com

    It is all about training like Gary said in the article. If it takes a java developer with 12 years of experience to take 2.5 months enough knowledge to get up to speed to work with SharePoint then there is a big learning curve that some can’t handle…

    SharePoint is ‘free’ in Windows Server 2003 and beyond and there are thousands of intranet websites in use all over the place.

    The money is with SharePoint as I have seen jobs advertised in the low 6 figures…

  • Peter Pitchford

    Why don’t the sites that want to use Sharepoint but can’t find programmers use open source programmers who already know how to do the same thing without Sharepoint? This article implies they don’t exist, or there is some reason government sites HAVE to use Microsoft products, all of which seems doubtful. If that’s true, then the article should say so and explain why, but it doesn’t.

    The way this is written amounts to government propaganda that people who know little about programming websites could easily fall for. It make it sound like government employees became brain dead zombies the minute they were bestowed with a Microsoft licence. They must be fed Sharepoint code or they will eat your children. Maybe they are trying to save Microsoft.

  • http://blogs.msdn.com/pandrew Paul Andrew

    If you want to learn how to do development with SharePoint then Microsoft has lots of material to help you. http://MSSharePointDeveloper.com has free online training and online Hands on Labs where you can get started. It also has links to other places to get more training. There’s lots of valuable collaboration functionality in SharePoint that you can build on and take advantage of. We are working hard to help make more training material available for developers who want to learn about it.

    Regards,
    Paul Andrew
    SharePoint Technical Product Manager at Microsoft

  • http://www.cactusmitch.info cactusmitch

    FLASH!
    I found a first edition of Bill Gates’ book, “The Road Ahead,” in a thrift store yesterday. It still had the CD sealed in it. (The one that won’t play on Vista.)

    I’d rather be made to eat barbed wire while listening to Barry Manaloe than invest my time in becoming a Microsoft Dupe.

  • Laz

    The money is with SharePoint as I have seen jobs advertised in the low 6 figures…

    Yes, because Microsoft does an excellent job of glossing over how monstrously complex the thing is to manage properly; as Blatt points out in the article, it’s very easy to shoot yourself in the foot early in an implementation and not realize it until you smell the gangrene six months later when it’s way too late to back out. And the kind of problems you make for yourself in this scenario aren’t interesting problems to fix either — resolving them is thankless, grinding bullshit work that you can only get people to do by paying them obscene amounts of money.

    It’s like crime-scene cleanup — you can make damned good money doing it, if you don’t mind spending your career waist-deep in other peoples’ misery. Most of us have other options, thank god.

  • http://www.sofortkreditdirekt.com Marta

    Since long time there are better software than Sharepoint.

  • http://www.biancaboya.com söve

    The way this is written söve amounts to government söve propaganda that people who know little about programming websites söve could easily fall for. It make söve it sound like government söve employees became brain dead zombies the minute they were söve bestowed with a Microsoft söve licence. They must be fed Sharepoint code or they söve will eat your children. Maybe they söve are trying to save Microsoft.

  • Mario Palomera

    If you love yourself and care about your customer, please don’t lock yourself and them.
    We did a custom CMS for the most important financial government institution in Mexico http://www.nafin.com.
    All open standards.
    Back-end: Velocity, Struts and Java of course.
    Front-end: CSS, XHTML, JS with JQuery

    Regards

  • Kevin Davis

    I’m a program manager working on the SharePoint product team (wikis, blogs, permissions). There are a lot of really vague complaints here. I’d be more than happy to take specific feedback back to the product team.

    Folks can reach me through email or on twitter (@spwiki).

  • stüdyo

    thanks for entry

  • http://howtohacklife101.blogspot.com/ John Mclane

    Theres so much better software…

  • LarryI

    I’m a former IT person now working in Human Resources. I’d like to become an expert Sharepoint *Admin*; the guy who winds up taking care of the site and supporting once it’s been built. The liaison/bridge person between IT and business users. What’s the best path to becoming a SP Admin expert?