Mon
Apr 20
2009
The Lean Startup Talk From Web 2.0 Expo
by Brady Forrest | @brady | comments: 1
One of our most popular talks at the Web 2.0 Expo SF was Eric Ries' The Lean Startup: a Disciplined Approach to Imagining, Designing, and Building New Products. I've embedded an audio version of his slides above. Eric recommends the talk for people who want to:
- Identify a profitable business model faster and cheaper than your competitors.
- Continuously discover what customers want to buy before building or making follow-on investments in new features.
- Ship new software at a dizzying pace: multiple times a day while improving quality and lowering costs.
- Build a company-wide culture of decision-making based on real facts, not opinions.
Eric has a follow-up to his talk and more thoughts about Lean Startups on his blog.
tags: web 2.0
| comments: 1
submit: 
0 TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/8734
Comments: 1
Post A Comment:
(please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)
STAY CONNECTED
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
O'Reilly Tools of Change for Publishing Conference, February 22 - 24, 2010, New York, NY
Where 2.0 Conference, March 30 - April 1, 2010, San Jose, CA
O'Reilly MySQL Conference & Expo, April 12 - 15, 2010, Santa Clara, CA
Web 2.0 Expo, May 3 - 6, 2010, San Francisco, CA
Gov 2.0 Expo, May 25 - 27, 2010, Washington, DC
$249.00Twitter and the Micro-Messaging Revolution, OReilly Radar Report
RECENT COMMENTS
- Thomas Lord on The Lean Startup Talk From Web 2.0 Expo: The problem is one of f...
RADAR TOPICS
Thomas Lord [2009-04-20 08:11 PM]
The problem is one of form and function. "Web 2.0" software that fits that model is a nearly disjoint subset from "Web 2.0" software that is socially responsible. Effectively, he's an accidental slave trader. But, the radar mindset has trouble seeing that because in the radar mind-set the purported requirements of big-C capital are the primary engineering constraint and the rest follows from that.
I say the above and, while it is entirely defensible and even constructive, the capital-chasing instincts behind the rhetoric seem to make it impossible for y'all to talk about. In the bubble around this stuff, critique with a view of social responsibility - if it leads to negative conclusions about financially promising or successful endevors - seems to be considered at least rude and possibly threatening.
I miss the Enlightenment. That was a nice party while it lasted.
-t
p.s., you have a (typically) funny way with the phrase "real facts".